In 2000 a engineering student would have felt happy after securing a distinction. A fail in one subject would have bothered him and his parents, but it was not a rare feat. Year loss was not a miracle, but a not so common phenomenon. Some subjects were always where students had fear of passing till the results were announced and others no one bothered to even study but still passes.
The faculty of the colleges, some dictated notes during class, some gave the notes for photocopying but not all followed the same general principle. The teaching varied from purely exam point view to most general and some even confused the students about the methodology. Different kinds of teachers were there, some very ordinary and some extraordinary based on the tastes of the students of the class.
Some periods always used to have a background murmuring while in those of strict faculty there was a near pin drop silence. The absolute silence in the classroom was found only when there are no students inside the class. The parents of the students cared less about the internal marks and some didn't even bother to check about the final marks also.
In the end, the 100 odd students have completed the engineering with me, few were left out and later could complete the course. Now many of them are successful people. The salaries of all the batch mates may not be in sync with the marks obtained, but nevertheless everyone got a job and is earning in means possible to make a life. During those years, getting an engineering college seat was no miracle, since there were many colleges and many options.
Everyone was doing an engineering course with the aim of the getting a software job (high paying) to meet the financial demands of his/her family or to meet the aspirations of the self. But times were more difficult previously when the number of colleges were less and the seats very limited. An engineer would be a highly respected person and the engineer is for himself through the course and afterwards.
But come 2013, in the name of transparency, interaction and what not, the parents of the students have become more careful of the future of the student than the student himself. the parents are making sure that their wards have sufficient guidance and help which they have missed. The care and fear the parents now show is too much concerning.
The institutions have started to outdo each over by the extra protection and care they shower and which the government started. When the students began committing suicides for failing in subjects, instead of sensitizing the citizenry with ads and other shows that "marks are not the only things in education", it made education more easier. To make a mark, the students are forced to attend many a special classes.
Initially the parents force their wards and then Stockholm syndrome takes over and the child beings to enjoy only to generate pent up anger and frustration in future life. Now with the anti-superstition bill that the governments are competing to pass and appease some communities, the psychiatric medicine bills and imports will only increase over the period of time.
The only thing that should be part of the education is learning, marks or no marks is secondary. The focus is to become better and the evaluation criterion should be in the same direction. To make a mark the criterion at initial and final stages are diluted and then Governments spends crores on improving the research. this is the cycle to loot the taxpayers money.
Education : the process of receiving or giving systematic instruction, especially at a school or university
Evaluation : the making of a judgement about the amount, number, or value of something; assessment.
Why in education evaluation necessary? This is a serious question that needs answers.